As I’ve gotten older I like to think I’ve become more pragmatic in my politlcal views. When I was young I was definitely a little far to the Left. Eg. “Save the trees, Hooray Greenpeace!” - that sort of thing. As I got older, I think I acquired more empathy for people - “loggers need to feed their families too, is there a way we can co-exist peacefully with the environment without endangering people’s jobs?”
A few years back, the Road to Surfdom blog used to be run by Tim Dunlop. He left to start a new blog - Blogacracy. As time has gone on, I’ve noticed Road to Surfdom becoming more and more politically extreme, and less willing to entertain rational opposing viewpoints. In other words, it’s an echo-chambers for the rusted-on far-left Howard haters.
For instance, this article bashing self-funded retirees for investing in Cash Management trusts -
The very expression ’self-funded retiree’ is objectionable. Its implicit message is that the person being labelled is of a superior quality, someone who’s conscientiously relieved the community of the cost of paying for their retirement. Once upon a time everyone was expected to take responsibility for their own lives and we had a safety net of welfare payments to support the minority who couldn’t manage to do it. Now this has been turned on its head and people who aren’t eligible for welfare claim some sort of exceptional standing in society - while they shamelessly hold their hands out for as many gifts from the government as they can wangle.
The author slags off and abuses every single self-funded retiree, under the assumption that they’re really a bunch of welfare cheats and good-for-nothing pro-capitalist neo-conservative Howard voters.
My parents are both “self-funded retirees”. My father worked his ass off for 30 long years, acruing enough money so he and his wife could support themselves without relying on Government handouts. I’d remind the author that not every self-funded retiree is a welfare cheat. But I don’t think that kind of politely expressed disagreement would go down well in the far-left echo chamber that is the Road to Surfdom.
It’s a shame really. When Tim Dunlop was running Road to Surfdom (and then Blogacracy) you’d get plenty of dissenting opinion. Some of it was rational and well-expressed, some of it wasn’t. I think a diversity of viewpoints is an example of a vibrant democracy. My biggest problem - especially with political blogs nowadays - is that they’ve become echo chambers for people with extremist views on both sides. There’s no room for people like me anymore.
That being said, here’s the policy that I’ll follow from now on: I don’t care whether you’re a Conservative or you’re a Liberal. I don’t care whether you voted for McCain and Howard or Obama and Rudd. I only ask that you express your viewpoint politely, reasonably and rationally without abusing people with dissenting opinions. Just because we disagree with each other doesn’t mean we have to hate each other too. There’s too much hate in the world, and that’s 90% of the problem.