Anna Paquin, along with Claire Danes, is one of my favourite actresses. So I’ve taken a passing interest in ‘The Squid and the Whale’ - a film about the breakdown of an overly intellectual family and the impact it has on their two children. Having never seen the film, this article fascinated me -
“Interesting” is the highest compliment The Squid and the Whale’s family patriarch, Bernard (Daniels), can give something. His constant overuse of this one non-commital, cold, academic word for everything made me feel a pang of shame since it is also one of the first adjectives I myself jump to to describe a work of art I admire. The film as a whole made me feel somewhat ashamed to be the kind of person who says “interesting”.
This is due to the fact that the film feels one of the most impassioned, persuasive, and yet even-handed, arguments against ‘intellectuals’ I have recently come across, one that combines a number of different styles and influences, most of which could probably be described as variations on stories of New York intellectual life. I want to look at these influences in relation to Squid to try to find out quite how it made me ashamed of the part of me that wants to call everything I like not “wonderful”, or “beautiful” but “interesting”.
I’ve always rued the fact I was always less “intellectual” than some of my University counterparts. My life up til’ now seems to value intelligence more than intellectualism. “Intellectualism is the facets of the jewel”, as someone once said. So this argument in the article fascinated me. I’m so in awe of overly-intellectual people, it never occurred to me that there could be a personal downside to that kind of personality.
It was precisely for that reason - valuing intellectual thought processes over very human reactions - that caused me to stop visiting Doctor Who forums. Hardcore Who fans pride themselves on being more “intellectual” than a mainstream audience. Ideas are more important than mere emotion. No wonder why intellectual hardcore Who fans hate the new series. New Who values emotional intelligence - something which is anathema to the intellectual way of thought.